REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf Zevachim 77
ZEVACHIM 77-78 - Dedicated to the leaders and participants in the Dafyomi
shiurim at the Young Israel of New Rochelle, by Andy & Nancy Neff
(a) What problem do we have with the extra bit of oil which the 'Metzora'
added after the Kemitzah, to perform the Matanos, in case it was an Asham
(b) We answer that he redeems it.
What must he stipulate when he does?
(c) How come that that oil was not sanctified together with the rest of the
(d) What problem do we still have, assuming he redeems the oil ...
- ... inside the Azarah?
- ... outside the Azarah?
(a) We conclude that he redeems it inside the Azarah.
Then how do we
resolve the problem of bringing Chulin into the Azarah?
(b) If the Kohen had reversed the order and first finish all the Avodos as
if it was a Metzora, before performing the Kemitzah, we would have avoided
the last set of Kashyos.
Why then, did we not establish the Beraisa like
(c) How do we reconcile our interpretation of the Beraisa with Rebbi Shimon
himself, who holds in a Mishnah in 'Kol ha'Tadir' that one cannot donate oil
as a Korban?
(a) What does Rebbi Eliezer say in K'riysus about bringing an Asham Taluy as
(b) Rav Rechumi in the name of Rav Huna bar Tachlifa asked why Rebbi Shimon
did not require the 'Metzora' to stipulate that if he is not a Metzora, then
the animal will be an Asham Metzora.
What would be the advantage of doing
(c) What did Rav Rechumi try to prove from here?
(d) Why was Ravina surprised at the Kashya?
(a) Our Mishnah discusses a case where limbs of a Chatas became mixed up
with those of an Olah.
According to Rebbi Eliezer, all the limbs must be
placed on the Mizbe'ach.
How does he justify burning the limbs of the
(b) On what grounds do the Chachamim disagree with him?
(c) So what do they say should be done with the limbs?
(d) Rebbi Eliezer's source is the Pasuk in Vayikra "ve'el ha'Mizbe'ach Lo
Ya'alu le'Rei'ach Nicho'ach" (as we explained earlier) .
If the Rabbanan
preclude 'Kol she'Mimenu le'Ishim' (that we discussed earlier) from the word
"Osam (in the Pasuk "Korban Reishis Takrivu Osam"), what do they include in
the main Pasuk?
(a) What does Rebbi Eliezer incorporate in the Pasuk "ve'el ha'Mizbe'ach Lo
Ya'alu" with regard to the prohibition of bringing Se'or and D'vash on the
(b) What does Rebbi Eliezer incorporate in the Pasuk "ve'el ha'Mizbe'ach Lo
(c) From where do the Rabbanan learn that?
(a) According to Rebbi Yehudah in a Beraisa, Rebbi Eliezer and the Rabbanan
argue in a case where the limbs of a complete Olah got mixed up with those
of a Ba'al-Mum.
Answers to questions
What will they both hold in a case where the limbs of ...
(b) If Rebbi Eliezer agrees with the Chachamim that the the latter are not
brought on the Mizbe'ach, because the limbs of a Rovei'a and a Nirva are
totally unfit, we ask, what makes him agree with them with regard to the
limbs of a Ba'al-Mum? By which sort of Mum does Rav Huna establish the
- ... a Chatas became mixed up with those of an Olah (like in our Mishnah)?
- ... a Rovei'a or Nirva?
(c) And he establishes the author as Rebbi Akiva.
What does Rebbi Akiva
say about an animal with Dukin she'be'Ayin?
(d) How does Rav Papa establish the Beraisa to answer the Kashya that even
Rebbi Akiva only permits such an animal on the Mizbe'ach Bedi'eved, but not
(a) If the Beraisa is speaking when the pieces are already on the Mizbe'ach,
and the author is Rebbi Akiva, we ask, the Tana ought to be even more
Why is that?
(b) We therefore conclude that Rebbi Eliezer's source (for permitting limbs
of a Chatas that became mixed up with a Ba'al Mum) must be the Pasuk "Mum
What does he learn from there?
(c) What do the Rabbanan learn from "Mum Bam"?
(d) Rebbi Eliezer learns this from the Lashon "Bam", when it would have been
more correct to write "Bahem".
What do the Rabbanan learn from "Bam"
(a) How does Rebbi Eliezer's Lashon 'Ro'eh Ani es B'sar ha'Ba'alas-Mum' (in
place of B'sar ha'Chatas' in our Mishnah) seem to clash with Rebbi Eliezer's
D'rashah from "Mum Bam"?
(b) How do we answer this Kashya? If Rebbi Eiezer does not need to learn it
from Chatas, then why does he cite it?
(c) On what grounds do the Rabbanan then reject Rebbi Eliezer's comparison
of limbs of a Ba'al Mum to limbs of a Chatas?
(a) What does Rebbi Eliezer rule in our Mishnah, in a case where limbs of
complete animals became mixed up with limbs of Ba'alei-Mumin, and one of the
heads was sacrificed?
(b) Why is that?
(c) What do the Rabbanan go so far as to say?
(d) What will Rebbi Eliezer say in such a case?
(a) According to Rebbi Elazar, Rebbi Eliezer only permits the heads to be
brought two at a time (but not one by one).
Why is that?
(b) Rebbi Ya'akov asked Rebbi Yirmiyah bar Tachlifa how Rebbi Elazar will
reconcile his statement with the Seifa 'Afilu Karvu Kulan Chutz me'Echad
Meihen ... '.
What did he reply?
(a) Our Mishnah now discusses blood of Korbanos that has been mixed with
Up to which stage is it still considered blood (and may be
sprinkled) if it is mixed with ...
(b) Rebbi Yehudah disagrees with the latter ruling.
- ... water?
- ... wine?
- ... the blood of Beheimos or Chayos?
What does he say?
(a) What does the Mishnah say in a case where the blood became mixed up with
Answers to questions
(b) The same applies if it became mixed with Dam ha'Tamtzis.
What is Dam
(c) Rebbi Eliezer permits sprinkling blood that was mixed with Dam
To which extent does the Tana Kama agree with him?