REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf Yevamos 90
YEVAMOS 86-90 - Ari Kornfeld has generously sponsored the Dafyomi
publications for these Dafim for the benefit of Klal Yisrael.
(a) What does the Beraisa learn from the Pasuk in Emor "ve'Nasan la'Kohen es
ha'Kodesh" (with regard to a Zar who ate Terumah be'Shogeg)?
(b) According to Sumchus quoting Rebbi Meir if he ate Terumah Tehorah and
paid Chulin Temei'im 'be'Shogeg Tashlumav Tashlumin, be'Meizid, Ein
What do the Rabbanan say?
(c) What is the problem with saying 'be'Meizid, Ein Tashlumav Tashlumin'?
(d) Why is the statement 've'ka'Meshalem Midi de'Chazi Lei bi'Yemei Tum'aso'
not fully correct? Then what does it mean?
(a) Rava or Kadi therefore amend the Beraisa. According to the new text,
someone who ate Terumah Temei'ah, may pay Terumah Temei'ah.
Then over what
are Rebbi Meir and the Rabbanan arguing?
(b) min ha'Torah, the Chulin Temei'im that one pays for eating Terumah
Temei'ah is considered a good payment, as we learned on the previous Amud.
Then what is the problem with Sumchus Amar Rebbi Meir's ruling?
(c) On what grounds do we initially refute the answer that what Sumchus
means is that he must give a second time, despite the fact that the first
one is valid (so that any woman whom the Kohen betrothed will remain
(d) How do we ultimately establish the Machlokes between Sumchus and the
(a) On what does the Tzitz atone min ha'Torah?
(b) Then what is the problem with the Beraisa 'Dam she'Nitma, ve'Zorku
be'Shogeg Hurtzah, be'Meizid, Lo Hurtzah' (mi'de'Rabbanan)?
(c) How does Rebbi Yossi b'Rebbi Chanina interpret 'Lo Hurtzah'?
(a) What do we learn from the Pasuk in Tetzaveh "ve'Achlu Osam Asher Kupar
Answers to questions
(b) How does Rabah account for the fact that, when all's said and done,
Chazal negated the Mitzvah of eating the meat of the Korban?
(a) Now that Rabah differentiated between 'Kum Asei' and 'Shev ve'Al
Ta'aseh', Rav Chisda was spared from asking him from Areil, Haza'ah, Izmeil,
Sadin be'Tziztis, Kivsei Atzeres, Shofar and Lulav, all of which are Mitzvos
and which Chazal negated with their decrees.
What is the case of ...
(b) What is normally the Din (status) of a Korban that is brought she'Lo
- ... 'Areil'?
- ... 'Haza'ah'?
- ... 'Izmel' (the knife of Milah)?
- ... 'Sadin be'Tziztis'?
- ... 'Kivsei Atzeres'? Which three Asei does this incorporate?
(c) What do we learn from the Pasuk in Shoftim "Eilav Tishme'un"? Which two
La'avin did Eliyahu negate?
(d) How does Rabah reconcile this Beraisa with his previous statement, that
Chazal only have the right to negate Torah law be'Shev ve'Al Ta'aseh, but
not be'Kum va'Asei?
(a) Initially, a husband was able to negate the Get that he had sent his
wife through a Sh'li'ach in front of a Beis-Din.
What is wrong with the text that reads that Kidushei Kesef is Bateil because
it is only mi'de'Rabbanan, but what about Kidushei Bi'ah?
Why did Raban Gamliel
make make a Takanah forbidding it?
(b) According to Rebbi, if a husband contravened Raban Gamliel's Takanah and
negated the Get that he sent his wife through a Sh'li'ach, the Get is
Why does Raban Shimon ben Gamliel say that it is
(c) Who gave Chazal the right to validate the Get (seeing as min ha'Torah,
the Get is negated)?
(d) How does this concession apply to ...
- ... Kidushei Kesef?
- ... Kidushei Bi'ah?
(a) Rebbi Eliezer ben Ya'akov heard that Beis-Din have the authority to beat
and to punish (in any way), even unofficially.
What do we learn from the Pasuk in Emor ...
Which two examples does he
present of this happening?
(b) How does Rabah explain this (seeing as these were not Shev ve'Al
We learned in our Mishnah that neither man is entitled to her findings, to
what she produces or to nullify her vows.
- ... in connection with burial "Ki im li'She'eiro ha'Karov Eilav"?
- ... "Lo Yitamei Ba'al be'Amav le'Heichalo"?
Why are they not entitled to ...
Answers to questions
- ... her findings?
- ... to what she produces?
- ... to nullify her vows?