(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof

Ask A Question on the daf

Previous daf

Nazir 24

1a) [line 7] MA'OS SETUMIN - unspecified money; i.e. money that was set aside for the purchase of a set of Korbanos without designating which Korban would be purchased with which part of the money
b) [line 7] MA'OS MEFURASHIN - specified money; money that was set aside for the purchase of a set of Korbanos where the owner designated which money would be used to buy each one of his Korbanos, a Chatas, an Olah and a Shelamim

2a) [line 9] LO NEHENIN V'LO MO'ALIN - It is forbidden mid'Rabanan to derive benefit from them and if one does, he does not bring a Korban Me'ilah since money that is "destined for Yam ha'Melach," i.e. that must be destroyed, and animals that put to death, are not considered Kodshei HaSh-m (Me'ilah 3a)

b) [line 9] V'LO MO'ALIN (ME'ILAH)
(a) It is forbidden to derive personal benefit from anything that is Hekdesh, as the Torah states, "Lo Suchal le'Echol b'Sha'arecha...u'Nedarecha Asher Tidor" - "You may not eat in your settlements...and your pledges [to Hekdesh] that you will pledge" (Devarim 12:17) (RAMBAM Hilchos Me'ilah 1:1-3). The minimum amount for which one transgresses this prohibition is a Perutah's worth of benefit.
(b) If someone benefited from Hekdesh intentionally, he receives Malkos and must pay to Hekdesh the amount that he benefited. However, the object from which he benefited remains Hekdesh.
(c) If someone benefited from Hekdesh unintentionally, the object loses its Kedushah. He must bring a Korban Me'ilah and repay Hekdesh the value of his benefit plus an additional *fifth* (of the ensuing total, or a *quarter* of the original value). This is true of any object that has Kedushas Damim (i.e. it's value is consecrated to Hekdesh). An object that has Kedushas ha'Guf (i.e. an object with intrinsic Kedushah, such as the utensils used in the Beis ha'Mikdash or a live Korban that is used in the Beis ha'Mikdash "as is") does not lose its Kedushah under any circumstances (Rosh Hashanah 28a).

When a Nazir completes his period of Nezirus, he must offer three sacrifices: a male sheep as an Olah, a female sheep as a Chatas, and a ram as a Shelamim. Together with the Shelamim he brings 6 and 2/3 Esronos of Soles (fine flour), which are made into 20 loaves of Matzah, 10 Chalos (unleavened loaves) and 10 Rekikin (flat Matzos). He then shaves off his hair and burns it under the pot in which the Zero'a of the Shelamim is cooked (Bamidbar 6:18). (Sefer ha'Chinuch #377)

4) [line 17] SHE'KACH KASAV LAH, "KOL ACHRAYUS D'IS LACH ALAI MIN KADMAS DENA" - (a) because this is what *he* wrote for her [in the *Kesuvah*], "All [of your] liabilities [to bring obligatory Korbanos] that you have from before this time are upon me" (MEFARESH, ROSH 2nd explanation); (b) Accordig to the Girsa SHE'KACH *KOSEVES (LEI) [LO,*] "KOL ACHRAYUS D'IS *LI ALACH* MI'KADMAS DENA" - because this is what *she* writes to him in the *receipt* for the payment of her *Kesuvah* (if he divorces her), "All of your liability for my obligations from before this time (i.e. during the period in which they were married), [is absolved]" (TOSFOS, ROSH 1st explanation)


5) [line 6] SHE'KAMTZASAH ME'ISASAH - that she scraped together by being skimpy with her dough

6) [line 10] LO SEISIV! AL KAR'ICH! - Do not sit down, [but rather stand] on your feet! (TOSFOS DH Amar, ROSH)

7) [line 10] AD D'AMART LI HADA MILSA - until you tell/explain to me the following: (a) In this list of the four rams (that are Korbenos Shalmei Nazir) that are not accompanied by loaves of bread, what is the source for the last one, "shele'Achar Kaparah," which is not an explicit Mishnah like the other three? (TOSFOS, 1st explanation); (b) which are the four rams that are not accompanied by loaves of bread? (According to this, the words "v'Elu Hen..." are part of Avuha bar Ihi's answer, and Shmuel's question is implicit) (ROSH, 1st explanation); (c) why does it say that there are only four rams that are not accompanied by loaves of bread? Actually there is a fifth case [of Shachatan she'Lo k'Mitzvasan] (According to this, all of the words "v'Elu Hen" (line 11) until "Lo Lechem v'Lo Zero'a" (line 34) are part of Shmuel's question) (TOSFOS, ROSH, 2nd explanations)

Next daf


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,