REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf Kesuvos 21
KESUVOS 21-23 (Seder night, and Chol ha'Moed Pesach) - have been anonymously
dedicated by a unique Ohev Torah and Marbitz Torah living in Ramat Beit
(a) 'ke'she'Timtzi Lomar, le'Divrei Rebbi, al K'sav Yadan Heim Me'idim'.
What is the meaning of ...
(b) What do the Chachamim hold?
- ... 'ke'she'Timtzi Lomar'?
- ... 'al K'sav Yadan Heim Mei'idim'?
(c) Why do we need to explicitly interpret the Machlokes in this way? Why is
it not obvious?
(a) In which case are the Chachamim (who maintain 'al Manah she'bi'Shtar
Heim Me'idim') more strict than Rebbi? Why is that?
(b) What does one do if only one new witness can be found?
(c) Why should he sign his signature on clay and not on parchment? What are
we afraid of?
(d) Why would we not be afraid of the same thing when he sends his signature
on a piece of clay?
(a) Rav Yehudah Amar Shmuel rules like the Chachamim. Why is such a ruling
necessary, in view of the principle 'Yachid ve'Rabim, Halachah ke'Rabim'?
(b) How do we reconcile Shmuel's previous ruling (like the Chachamim) with
the case of a document that emerged from Shmuel's Beis-Din where the
Beis-Din substantiated it, specifically stating that each witness had
verified both signatures - like Rebbi?
(c) What was Shmuel afraid of?
(a) What does Rav Yehudah Amar Shmuel mean when he rules that a witness and
a Dayan may combine?
Ameimar praised Ravna'i the brother of Rebbi Chiya bar Aba, who cited the
ruling of Shmuel.
(b) Rami bar Chama concurs with Shmuel's ruling, but Rava is unimpressed.
What is the basis of his objection?
(c) We therefore conclude that the Halachah is like Rami bar Yechezkel.
Who was Rami bar Yechezkel?
(d) What did *he* say?
What did Rav Ashi say to him? How were Ameimar and Rami
bar Chama related?
Answers to questions
(a) What does Rav Safra ... Amar Rav Huna or Amar Rav Huna Amar Rav say in a
case where two of the Dayanim recognize the signatures of both witnesses,
but one does not? Up to when are two Dayanim permitted to testify in front
of the one, according to the initial version of his statement?
(b) What did Rav Papi Amar Rava say regarding the Beis-Din's substantiation
of a document that forces us to retract from the original version of his
(c) So what *did* Rav Huna say?
(d) What major principle do we learn from here?
(a) On what grounds does Rav Ashi reject the proof from sRav Huna's
statement that ...
(b) The Mishnah in Rosh Hashanah teaches that if three members of Sanhedrin
saw the new moon, two of them must stand down to be replaced by other
members of the Sanhedrin. Then they testify before the three Dayanim who did
not see the new moon ... .
- ... once Dayanim recognize the witnesses' signatures, it is not necessary to verbally attest to the signitures in front of them?
- ... it is necessary to attest to the signatures on behalf of each of Dayan who does recognize them?
Why do they need to testify at all? Why can
they not ...
(c) What did Rebbi Aba tell Rav Safra, when he asked him to reconcile this
ruling with the previous one (with regard to Kiyum Sh'taros - the
verification of documents), where we just ruled 'Eid Na'aseh Dayan'?
- ... just sit down and pronounce Rosh Chodesh there and then?
- ... testify before the third Dayan, and then sit down and pronounce Rosh Chodesh together with him?
(d) Rebbi Chiya bar Rav ultimately presented his father with the Kashya.
What did he reply?
(a) What did Rav Huna Amar Rav rule with regard to three Dayanim who sat
down to substantiate a Sh'tar, and before the third Dayan was able to sign,
a rumor spread that he was Pasul?
We finally establish Rav Huna Amar Rav's ruling with regard to a rumor that
he is a thief.
(b) Why can they not attest to his validity once they have signed?
(c) What does 'a rumor' imply?
(d) Why can this not be speaking about a rumor that ...
- ... he is a thief (according to our initial understanding)?
- ... he is a slave?
How do we repudiate what we asked earlier 'T'rei u'Trei
Answers to questions