REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf Gitin 80
GITIN 80 (5 Iyar 5761) - Dedicated by Marsha and Lee Weinblatt of Teaneck,
New Jersey. May they see much Nachas from their daughter Jodi, who just
became a Kalah, and the rest of their extended family, and may we soon merit
to see the return of Hashem to Zion!
(a) The same K'nas that we just discussed will apply ...
1. ... if they changed either the man's or the woman's name. Which other
two things belong to this list?
(b) What is the last case in this list of K'nasos?
2. ... to a woman whose husband died and whose Tzarah was an Ervah to the
Yavam, if after she went and remarried, her Tzarah was found to be an
Aylonis. How many Arayos are there in which case this Halachah will apply?
3. ... to a woman who remarried after her husband died, relying on the Yibum
performed by her Tzarah, who was subsequently found to be an Aylonis.
Seeing as we normally assume only the child of Chayvei Kareis to be a
Mamzer, how come that these two latter cases (of Yevamah le'Shuk), which are
only Chayvei La'avin, are included in our Mishnah?
(c) Rebbi Elazar restricts this insertion to where the mistake is discovered
immediately (which will be explained later in the Sugya).
Why did Chazal
not extend it to where the husband produced the Get later?
(a) When the Tana speaks about 'Malchus she'Einah Hogenes' he is referring
Having taught us the K'nas by ...
Why does he refer to Rome as a 'Malchus she'Einah Hogenes'?
(b) Why did Chazal require the Malchus to be inserted in the Get?
(c) In spite of the fact that the woman has only contravened a Takanas
Chachamim (and min ha'Torah, the Get is perfectly Kasher), the woman has to
leave both husbands and her children are Mamzeirim. This is due to a
statement by Rav Hamnuna in the name of Ula.
What did Rav Hamnuna say in
the name of Ula? According to which Tana did he say this?
(d) How do we know that this is the opinion of our Mishnah?
- ... 'Leshum Malchus she'Einah Hogenes', why did the Tana have to then add the case of 'Leshum Malchus Madai, Leshum Malchus Yavan'?
- ... 'Leshum Malchus Madai, Leshum Malchus Yavan', why did he need to add the case of 'Leshum Binyan ha'Bayis'?
- ... 'Leshum Binyan ha'Bayis', why did find it necessary to add 'Leshum Churban ha'Bayis'?
(a) The Tana of our Mishnah includes the case of 'Hayah be'Mizrach ve'Kasav
Answers to questions
Why can this not be referring to a Sofer who changed the
place of domicile of the husband?
(b) Then what does it refer to?
(c) What instructions would Rav and Rav Huna issue to their respective
Sofrim to do, whenever they wrote a Get ...
- ... in Shili (even though they knew that it would be handed over in Hini)?
- ... in Hini (even though they knew that it would be handed over in Shili)?
(a) All of the stringencies in our Mishnah are based on the opinion of Rebbi
Meir, as we explained earlier.
What does Rav Yehudah Amar Shmuel quote the
Chachamim as saying? What is a 'Santer'?
(b) What did Rabah rule in the case where they wrote the date according to
the year the mayor of Bashchar came to power?
(c) Why will even Rebbi Meir ...
- ... in our Mishnah agree in this case?
- ... who disqualifies the Get in the case of Santer, agree here?
(a) Rebbi Aba Amar Rav Huna Amar Rav too, maintains that the Chachamim
disagree with Rebbi Meir in all the cases of Shalom Malchus.
Do they argue
in all the other cases in the Mishnah.
(b) How does Rav Ashi prove this from our Mishnah 'Shinah Shemo u'Sh'mah ...
, Teitzei mi'Zeh u'mi'Zeh ... '?
(a) What do we initially infer from our Mishnah 'Kol Arayos she'Amru
Tzaroseihen Mutaros, Halchu ha'Tzaros ha'Eilu *ve'Nis'u'* ve'Nimtze'u Eilu
Aylonis, Teitz'u mi'Zeh u'mi'Zeh'?
(b) What did Rav Hamnuna rule with regard to a Shomeres Yavam who had
relations with a stranger?
(c) How does Rav Hamnuna then explain the inference from our Mishnah?
(a) The second Lashon works in the reverse, and concludes 'Nis'u Dafka'
(like the Sugya began, not like Rav Hamnuna).
Our Mishnah presents two cases concerning a Yevamah who married and whose
Tzarah turned out to be an Aylonis.
What are we worried about in
the case when she married?
(b) With which case would we be likely to confuse this one, were it to be
permitted (see Tosfos DH 'Nis'u)?
(c) Why are we not worried when she committed adultery without actually
Having taught us the Din by ...
- ... Tzaras Ervah, why did the Tana find it necessary to repeat the Din in the case of a Tzarah who performed Yibum?
- ... a Tzarah who performed Yibum, why did he need to repeat the Din in the case of a Tzaras Ervah?
(a) In the case where the Sofer inadvertently handed the Get to the woman
and the receipt to the man, Rebbi Elazar differentiated between whether the
woman discovered the mistake le'Alter' (immediately - where we fine her, in
the way described in our Mishnah) or later (where we do not). According to
Rav Yehudah Amar Shmuel, 'le'Alter' means as long as they are discussing the
divorce; 'later' means once they have stopped discussing it.
Answers to questions
How does Rav
Ada bar Ahavah explain it?
(b) The Tana concludes 'Lo Kol Heimenu min ha'Rishon le'Abed Zechuso shel
Sheini'. According to Shmuel, considering that they have not yet married,
on what grounds does the Tana refer to him as 'Sheini'?